We help organizations hire, develop, and retain top performers using scientifically validated psychometrics and AI. In just 5…
4.9
26 reviews
Sub-Category
Talent Assessment Software
For hiring teams and HR leaders who need to compare candidates on more than a CV and an interview, using structured tests, games or AI-scored assessments to predict job performance.
Around 88% of candidate cvs recruiters receive may not be the right match. Equip helps recruiters quickly find the most skilled…
4.8
18 reviews
Testlify is #1 skills assessment and interviewing platform helping companies hire the best talent quickly, easily, accurately…
4.8
107 reviews
Game-based frontline hiring, serving global enterprises such as rituals, dhl & vodafone. We help frontline organisations identify…
4.7
30 reviews
The predictive index empowers companies to overcome their greatest workplace challenges. Powered by 60+ years of behavioral…
4.7
369 reviews
Pymetrics is now harver. Harver is the industry leading hiring solution helping organizations optimize their talent decisions…
4.6
171 reviews
Pymetrics is now harver. Harver is the industry leading hiring solution helping organizations optimize their talent decisions…
4.6
171 reviews
Vervoe's mission is to make hiring about performance, not background. We help employers make hiring decisions based on how well…
4.6
56 reviews
Testgorilla is a skills-based hiring platform helping organizations find and hire the right people - faster, fairer, and without…
4.5
781 reviews
Subscription
What is topgrading? The topgrading approach to hiring is not simply an evolution, it's a revolution. Topgrading’s proven…
4.3
10 reviews
Make smarter talent decisions-from hire to develop Wonderlic helps you hire with confidence and develop with purpose-by…
4.3
82 reviews
In the age of generative AI and a rapidly shifting requirement for skills, arctic shores gives you the power to uncover human…
Unrated
Technologies for a better workforce. In more than 100 countries worldwide, talentclick gives you data-driven insights to hire…
Unrated
Journeyfront's intelligent hiring platform for high-volume recruitment combines an ATS with AI-powered assessments, automation…
Unrated
Logi-serve brings rigorous science and advanced technology to the art of hiring and promoting talent. Founded in 2012 by a team…
Unrated
At pmaps, our mission is to provide organizations with a reliable assessment platform to evaluate the entry-level job seekers and…
Unrated
Saville assessment develop rigorous and work-relevant measurement tools which have transformed traditional approaches to…
Unrated
The talent games is an award-winning gamified talent assessments company. We provide online gamified assessments to companies for…
Unrated
These businesses build and run the tests, games and structured exercises that measure whether a candidate can actually do the job, rather than just describe it well on a CV. That covers cognitive ability tests, personality and behavioural questionnaires, situational judgement scenarios, gamified assessments, video interview scoring, and skills tests for specific roles like coding or sales. The output is a score or profile for each candidate, benchmarked against either the role, a top-performer profile, or a normed population, which then feeds into the shortlist decision alongside the CV and interview.
People start looking for this when hiring has become a volume problem or a consistency problem. A graduate scheme or a hourly-retail role gets thousands of applicants and there's no way to interview them all, so someone needs a defensible way to filter early. Or hiring managers are picking candidates on gut feel and interview performance alone, and the resulting hires aren't working out, turnover is high, or promotions aren't going to the people who actually perform. Sometimes it's a compliance driver: legal or HR wants a documented, consistent process that can be defended if a hiring decision is challenged, because interview panels are inconsistent and prone to bias that nobody can quite name.
The providers differ mainly in what they measure and how they prove it works. Some lean on decades-old psychometric models with published validity studies and norms; others use newer game-based or AI-driven methods that claim to measure the same traits with less candidate fatigue and less obvious "test-taking" feel, but with a shorter evidence trail. Some are built for one type of decision, technical skills testing, sales aptitude, leadership potential, graduate screening, while others are general-purpose and configurable to any role. Worth comparing on: published validity and adverse-impact data rather than marketing claims, how long the assessment takes a candidate to complete, how well it integrates with your existing ATS, whether scoring is transparent enough to explain to a rejected candidate, and whether pricing is per assessment or per seat, which matters a lot at high volume.